diff --git a/journal/mooc-notes.md b/journal/mooc-notes.md
index cc03c8a85a0221b7ebad671d16917e5f509dcc77..c348fd05acf8423a1ed57692d7a0d4ee2d706868 100644
--- a/journal/mooc-notes.md
+++ b/journal/mooc-notes.md
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ I think that the main point is that, although reproductiblity can have *many* me
 we now collectively strieve to make reproductible research. 
 
 Why ?
-- **Legitimacy = reproductibility now** Perhaps in past centuries, legitimacy of the research and truths uncovered came hand in hand with 
-- the legitimacy and reputation of scientists that made such discoveries, because there were few of them. Now, legitimacy is about consensus and there cannot
-- be consensus if _*others*_ cannot verify your assertions
+- **Legitimacy = reproductibility now** Perhaps in past centuries, legitimacy of the research and truths uncovered came hand in hand with
+- the legitimacy and reputation of scientists that made such discoveries, because there were few of them. 
+- Now, legitimacy is about consensus and there cannot  be consensus if _*others*_ cannot verify your assertions
 - **Transparency** A new movement of transparency in science also influences the need for reproductibility
 - **Pragmatism** My own point of view is that, for some research areas, if an experiment or a method is not reproductible then it's not useful