From 4eaf67aaa018e4222b24f22bb36bed56103f5561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 2e9b90b0e54ef71cf3cf1d083c595975
 <2e9b90b0e54ef71cf3cf1d083c595975@app-learninglab.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:07:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update mooc-notes.md

---
 journal/mooc-notes.md | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/journal/mooc-notes.md b/journal/mooc-notes.md
index cc03c8a..c348fd0 100644
--- a/journal/mooc-notes.md
+++ b/journal/mooc-notes.md
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ I think that the main point is that, although reproductiblity can have *many* me
 we now collectively strieve to make reproductible research. 
 
 Why ?
-- **Legitimacy = reproductibility now** Perhaps in past centuries, legitimacy of the research and truths uncovered came hand in hand with 
-- the legitimacy and reputation of scientists that made such discoveries, because there were few of them. Now, legitimacy is about consensus and there cannot
-- be consensus if _*others*_ cannot verify your assertions
+- **Legitimacy = reproductibility now** Perhaps in past centuries, legitimacy of the research and truths uncovered came hand in hand with
+- the legitimacy and reputation of scientists that made such discoveries, because there were few of them. 
+- Now, legitimacy is about consensus and there cannot  be consensus if _*others*_ cannot verify your assertions
 - **Transparency** A new movement of transparency in science also influences the need for reproductibility
 - **Pragmatism** My own point of view is that, for some research areas, if an experiment or a method is not reproductible then it's not useful
 
-- 
2.18.1