From b46950bc964823590f5cfb62dee321c26cf4498b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: 7a4c0ea8dd604d935d3ecc0572dc77a9 <7a4c0ea8dd604d935d3ecc0572dc77a9@app-learninglab.inria.fr> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 13:25:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] no commit message --- module2/exo5/exo5_fr.ipynb | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/module2/exo5/exo5_fr.ipynb b/module2/exo5/exo5_fr.ipynb index 26ad6d9..6203509 100644 --- a/module2/exo5/exo5_fr.ipynb +++ b/module2/exo5/exo5_fr.ipynb @@ -686,6 +686,30 @@ "analyse et de regarder ce jeu de données sous tous les angles afin\n", "d'expliquer ce qui ne va pas." ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "## Critical Review of the Challenger O-ring Analysis\n", + "\n", + "After reproducing the historical analysis, three reasoning errors became clear:\n", + "\n", + "1. **Key data were excluded** — the engineers only considered flights that showed O-ring damage, ignoring those with no damage. This introduced selection bias.\n", + "2. **Extrapolation beyond available data** — the Challenger launch temperature (~0 °C) was far below any recorded temperature in the dataset, so the predicted risk was unreliable.\n", + "3. **Uncertainty ignored** — the logistic regression results were interpreted without accounting for uncertainty (no confidence intervals), creating a false sense of precision.\n", + "\n", + "By including all flights, plotting the full dataset, and visualizing uncertainty bands, we can see that the risk of failure increases sharply at lower temperatures — meaning that the Challenger launch conditions were clearly unsafe.\n" + ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "code", + "execution_count": null, + "metadata": {}, + "outputs": [], + "source": [ + "\n" + ] } ], "metadata": { @@ -705,7 +729,7 @@ "name": "python", "nbconvert_exporter": "python", "pygments_lexer": "ipython3", - "version": "3.7.3" + "version": "3.6.4" } }, "nbformat": 4, -- 2.18.1