From 5fc5177f5facf39420652d03b695957ac41b9ec7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: e7422cd3159d46c5212576fce1c4663d Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:35:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] updated --- module2/exo5/exo5_en.ipynb | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/module2/exo5/exo5_en.ipynb b/module2/exo5/exo5_en.ipynb index 888b006..919eede 100644 --- a/module2/exo5/exo5_en.ipynb +++ b/module2/exo5/exo5_en.ipynb @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ "### =====\n", "They filtered out all flights with zero malfunctions, which is a problem because now the data only shows cases where something went wrong. This makes it impossible to see how temperature actually affects failures across all flights.\n", "\n", - "--> Keep all flights, including those without malfunctions, so the model can learn the real failure probability" + "--> **Keep all flights, including those without malfunctions, so the model can learn the real failure probability**" ] }, { @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ "\n", "\n", "### ==================\n", - "A problem I find very confusing is that they said, \"These estimates should be interpreted with caution\" (even in the original analysis), but then they still relied on the model’s predictions and used those results to justify their reasoning. ????!" + "**A problem I find very confusing is that they said, \"These estimates should be interpreted with caution\" (even in the original analysis), but then they still relied on the model’s predictions and used those results to justify their reasoning. ????!**" ] }, { -- 2.18.1