diff --git a/README.md b/README.org
similarity index 51%
rename from README.md
rename to README.org
index 571cc63c624149bac3acd6a3830a407566ce2165..11390c7f55a45fef1e707879a5ce2b1bd86bed6e 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.org
@@ -1,31 +1,27 @@
 In this project, we gather reproduction attempts from the Challenger
 study. In particular, we try to reperform some of the analysis
 provided in *Risk Analysis of the Space Shuttle: Pre-Challenger
-Prediction of Failure* by *Siddhartha R. Dalal, Edward B. Fowlkes,
-Bruce Hoadley* published in *Journal of the American Statistical
-Association*, Vol. 84, No. 408 (Dec., 1989), pp. 945-957 and available
-at
-[https://studies2.hec.fr/jahia/webdav/site/hec/shared/sites/czellarv/acces_anonyme/OringJASA_1989.pdf](here)
-(here is [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290069](the official JASA
-webpage)).
+Prediction of Failure* by *Siddhartha R. Dalal, Edward B. Fowlkes, Bruce
+Hoadley* published in *Journal of the American Statistical Association*,
+Vol. 84, No. 408 (Dec., 1989), pp. 945-957 and available at [[https://studies2.hec.fr/jahia/webdav/site/hec/shared/sites/czellarv/acces_anonyme/OringJASA_1989.pdf][here]] (here
+is [[http://www.jstor.org/stable/2290069][the official JASA webpage]])
 
 On the fourth page of this article, they indicate that the maximum
 likelihood estimates of the logistic regression using only temperature
 are: $\hat{\alpha}=5.085$ and $\hat{\beta}=-0.1156$ and their
 asymptotic standard errors are $s_{\hat{\alpha}}=3.052$ and
 $s_{\hat{\beta}}=0.047$. The Goodness of fit indicated for this model
-was $G^2=18.086$ with 21 degrees of freedom. Our goal is to reproduce
+was $G^{2}=18.086$ with 21 degrees of freedom. Our goal is to reproduce
 the computation behind these values and the Figure 4 of this article,
 possibly in a nicer looking way.
 
-[**Here is our successful replication of Dalal et al. results using
-R**](file:challenger.pdf).
+*[[file:challenger.pdf][Here is our successful replication of Dalal et al. results using R]]*.
 
 In case it helps, we provide you with two implementations of this case
-study but we encourage you to **reimplement them by yourself** using both
+study but we encourage you to *reimplement them by yourself* using both
 your favourite language and an other language you do not know yet.
-- A [Jupyter Python3 notebook](file:src/Python3/challenger.ipynb)
-- An [Rmarkdown document](file:src/R/challenger.Rmd)
+- A [[file:src/Python3/challenger.ipynb][Jupyter Python3 notebook]]
+- An [[file:src/R/challenger.Rmd][Rmarkdown document]]
 
-Then **update the [meta-study result table available
-here](file:results.org) with your own results**.
+Then *update the [[file:results.org][meta-study result table available here]] with your own
+results*.