Erreur repository session1 -> session3

src/Python3/challenger.ipynb

@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "data = pd.read_csv(\"https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv\")\n",
+    "data = pd.read_csv(\"https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/blob/master/data/shuttle.csv\")\n",
     "data"
    ]
   },
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@
    "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
-    "**I think I have managed to correctly compute and plot the uncertainty of my prediction.** Although the shaded area seems very similar to [the one obtained by with R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/5c9dbef11b4d7638b7ddf2ea71026e7bf00fcfb0/challenger.pdf), I can spot a few differences (e.g., the blue point for temperature 63 is outside)... Could this be a numerical error ? Or a difference in the statistical method ? It is not clear which one is \"right\"."
+    "**I think I have managed to correctly compute and plot the uncertainty of my prediction.** Although the shaded area seems very similar to [the one obtained by with R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/challenger.pdf), I can spot a few differences (e.g., the blue point for temperature 63 is outside)... Could this be a numerical error ? Or a difference in the statistical method ? It is not clear which one is \"right\"."
    ]
   }
  ],

src/Python3/challenger_Python_ipynb.ipynb

@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
     }
    ],
    "source": [
-    "data = pd.read_csv(\"https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv\")\n",
+    "data = pd.read_csv(\"https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/blob/master/data/data/shuttle.csv\")\n",
     "data"
    ]
   },
@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@
    "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
    "source": [
-    "**I think I have managed to correctly compute and plot the uncertainty of my prediction.** Although the shaded area seems very similar to [the one obtained by with R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/5c9dbef11b4d7638b7ddf2ea71026e7bf00fcfb0/challenger.pdf), I can spot a few differences (e.g., the blue point for temperature 63 is outside)... Could this be a numerical error ? Or a difference in the statistical method ? It is not clear which one is \"right\"."
+    "**I think I have managed to correctly compute and plot the uncertainty of my prediction.** Although the shaded area seems very similar to [the one obtained by with R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/challenger.pdf), I can spot a few differences (e.g., the blue point for temperature 63 is outside)... Could this be a numerical error ? Or a difference in the statistical method ? It is not clear which one is \"right\"."
    ]
   }
  ],

src/Python3/challenger_Python_org.org

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ print_imported_modules()
 Let's start by reading data.
 
 #+begin_src python :results output :session :exports both
-data = pd.read_csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv")
+data = pd.read_csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/data/shuttle.csv")
 print(data)
 #+end_src
 
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ matplot_lib_filename
 **I think I have managed to correctly compute and plot the uncertainty
   of my prediction.** Although the shaded area seems very similar to
   [the one obtained by with
-  R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/5c9dbef11b4d7638b7ddf2ea71026e7bf00fcfb0/challenger.pdf),
+  R](https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/challenger.pdf),
   I can spot a few differences (e.g., the blue point for temperature
   63 is outside)... Could this be a numerical error ? Or a difference
   in the statistical method ? It is not clear which one is "right".

src/R/challenger.Rmd

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ devtools::session_info()
 # Loading and inspecting data
 Let's start by reading data:
 ```{r}
-data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv",header=T)
+data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/data/shuttle.csv",header=T)
 data
 ```
 

src/R/challenger_R_org.org

@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Packages-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 * Loading and inspecting data
 Let's start by reading data:
 #+begin_src R :results output :session *R* :exports both
-data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv")
+data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/data/shuttle.csv")
 data
 #+end_src
 

src/R/challenger_R_org_Windows_64bits.org

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ devtools::session_info()
 * Loading and inspecting data
 Let's start by reading data:
 #+begin_src R :results output :session *R* :exports both
-data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/gitlab/moocrr-session1/moocrr-reproducibility-study/raw/master/data/shuttle.csv")
+data = read.csv("https://app-learninglab.inria.fr/moocrr/gitlab/moocrr-session3/moocrr-reproducibility-study/tree/master/data/shuttle.csv")
 data
 #+end_src