"My computer tells me that $\\pi$ is *approximatively*"
"My computer tells me that $\\pi$ is *approximatively*"
]
]
...
@@ -32,7 +38,7 @@
...
@@ -32,7 +38,7 @@
"metadata": {},
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"source": [
"## Buffon's needle\n",
"## Buffon's needle\n",
"Applying the method of [Buffon's needle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffon%27s_needle_problem), we get the **approximation**"
"Applying the method of [Buffon's needle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffon%27s_needle_problem), we get the _approximation_"
]
]
},
},
{
{
...
@@ -65,7 +71,7 @@
...
@@ -65,7 +71,7 @@
"metadata": {},
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"source": [
"## Using a surface fraction argument\n",
"## Using a surface fraction argument\n",
"A method that is easier to understand and does not make use of thesin function is based on thefact that if $X \\sim U(0,1)$ and $Y \\sim U(0,1)$, then $P[X^2 + Y^2 \\leq 1] = \\frac{\\pi}{4}$ (see [\"Monte Carlo method\" on Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method). The following code uses this approach:"
"A method that is easier to understand and does not make use of the $\\sin$ function is based on the fact that if $X\\sim U(0,1)$ and $Y\\sim U(0,1)$, then $P[X^2+Y^2\\leq 1] = \\pi/4$ (see [\"Monte Carlo method\" on Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_method)). The following code uses this approach:"